Skip to content

PFAS & Polymers

Resolve complex distributions: polymers and PFAS.

Homologous series are a pattern problem, not a peak-picking problem. Kendrick mass defect analysis, automatic repeating-unit detection and suspect screening in one workflow.

The bottleneck

A distribution is not a list of peaks

Polymer and PFAS data defeat conventional feature detection because the answer is the series, not the individual signal. Software that hands back ten thousand unrelated features has not helped.

  • Repeating units identified by hand, spectrum by spectrum
  • Charge states and end groups confounding the series assignment
  • Suspect screening run in a separate tool from the detection

The workflow

From raw files to something you can publish.

Every step ships with default settings. You may customise each one, but you don’t have to.

  • Import

    LC or MALDI data from any major vendor, with no conversion step.

  • Detect and resolve

    Feature detection that survives the dense, overlapping signals a distribution produces.

  • Find the repeating unit

    The series suggested from the data rather than assumed before you start.

  • Map the distribution

    Kendrick mass defect and remainder plots, with charge and divisor under your control.

  • Screen against suspects

    Match what you detected against a suspect list you supply, without leaving the workflow.

  • Compare across samples

    One aligned feature table across the whole set, so distributions can be read sample to sample.

Capabilities

What you get out of the box.

Kendrick mass defect plot resolving polymer homologous series into distinct horizontal bands

LC or MALDI

LC or MALDI, we have a workflow to resolve complex polymer distributions.

Automatic repeating units

Automatic repeating unit suggestion.

KMD and RKM plots

Advanced polymer decoding tools including charge and divisor dependent Kendrick Mass Defect (KMD) and Remainder of Kendrick Mass (RKM) plot

PFAS suspect screening

Non-target screening against a suspect list you supply, run in the same workflow as the detection.

In the software

The Kendrick mass plot.

A polymer distribution that is an unreadable forest of peaks in the raw spectrum falls into rows you can count: one row per homologous series, one bubble per oligomer, spaced by the repeat unit. Change the divisor and a different repeat comes into line: C2H4O for the PEG here, CF2 for a PFAS screen. Bubble size carries intensity and colour carries retention time, so a series that shifts chromatographically shows up without leaving the plot.

PFAS & Polymers
Two mzmine plot windows over the dark workspace. Behind, a 4D feature plot drawing intensity as a surface across retention time. In front, a Kendrick mass defect plot of a poly(ethylene glycol) sample: bubbles fall into horizontal rows across m/z 500 to 1,600, one row per homologous series, bubble size scaled to intensity and colour to retention time, with charge and divisor controls for both axes beside the plot

In production

Labs already running this.

“As a central analytics department, we analyze a wide variety of highly complex samples. mzmine PRO has become an important part of our analytical toolbox because it allows us to keep all data fully within our internal environment, ensuring the highest levels of data security, IP protection, and regulatory compliance. With ongoing improvements and a non disruptive update approach, mzmine PRO provides a stable platform that meets our current research needs.”
Dr. Catharina Erbacher
Dr. Catharina Erbacher
Lab Team Leader LC-MS · BASF SE, Germany

The science

The methods behind this workflow, peer-reviewed.

2023
Integrative analysis of multimodal mass spectrometry data in MZmine 3 (opens in a new tab)
Schmid et al. · Nature Biotechnology 41, 447–449
The methods paper for the platform itself. Cite this one if you cite only one.
2020
Expanding the Kendrick Mass Plot Toolbox in MZmine 2 to Enable Rapid Polymer Characterization in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Data Sets (opens in a new tab)
Korf, Fouquet, Schmid et al. · Analytical Chemistry 92, 628–633
The Kendrick toolbox behind the PFAS and polymers workflow.
2018
Three-dimensional Kendrick mass plots as a tool for graphical lipid identification (opens in a new tab)
Korf, Vosse, Schmid et al. · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 32, 981–991
The original Kendrick mass defect work these tools grew out of.

Resources

Go deeper on PFAS & Polymers

We have written this up in more detail. There is one paper. One short form and all of it unlocks.

Get started

See it on your own data.

Send us a few representative files. We will build the pfas & polymers workflow and show you the result before you commit to anything.